JournalLINKEDIN

FIELD NOTE / LINKEDIN

AI can draft PLC logic. The plant decides.

The short film, the complete written thought, and the evidence behind it.

Published September 25, 2026 · LinkedIn edition

AI can draft PLC logic. The plant decides.

Short video caption

AI can speed PLC engineering, including drafting SCL/LAD logic, test logic and documentation; Siemens documents these as vendor capabilities. The acceptance boundary is the physical process. For a changed requirement, define expected actuator response, allowed timing and fault cases, then test them in simulation, appropriate hardware-in-the-loop and qualified commissioning. Keep safety functions under engineered safety controls and signed change authority. Conveyor example is simulated; no live plant was tested. #EricFieldNotes

Full written post / accessible read

AI can be genuinely useful in industrial automation. Siemens now documents an engineering assistant that generates SCL and ladder logic, tests and documentation inside TIA Portal. The crucial question is what evidence turns a good draft into an accepted change on a physical process.

Imagine a conveyor change that compiles and passes a nominal simulation. In the real acceptance case, a sensor stays high after a guard opens. The consequences are physical. Neither readable logic nor a generated test proves the required stop behavior or timing under that fault.

Let AI draft routines, migrate comments, generate candidate tests and map change impact. Then run a versioned cause-and-effect matrix through simulation with sensor and actuator faults, hardware-in-the-loop where appropriate, and qualified commissioning. Keep any safety function under its engineered safety control and change process, not a model's live judgment.

Before deployment, require each changed requirement to name the physical response, allowed time, fault test and accountable engineer. Keep the measured result with the versioned program. Do this because in OT the cost of a wrong assumption leaves the screen and enters the plant.

#EricFieldNotes

Evidence and boundary

On-screen boundary: VENDOR CAPABILITY · SIMULATED PLANT. The sources below support documented mechanisms and specifications; illustrative scenarios are not presented as measured incidents.

More notes from the work ↗